No ads. No brand influence.Powered by members like you.
The Product ReportThe Product Report
Sign InStart Free Trial
Browse AllAsk the Lab
The Product ReportThe Product Report

Product screening with visible evidence tiers, corrections, and no paid ratings.

Products

  • Supplements
  • Food
  • Personal Care
  • Baby & Kids
  • Skincare
  • Household
  • Pets
  • All Categories

Company

  • Investigations
  • Trust Center
  • Our Methodology

Support

  • Contact
  • FAQ
  • Privacy Policy
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms of Service
  • Accessibility

Legal

  • No Paid Ratings
  • Corrections Policy
  • Brand Response Portal

Retailer relationships: We earn no commission and have no affiliate relationships with any retailer or brand.

© 2026 TPR Operations, LLC. All rights reserved.

HomeTop RatedLabSearchProfile

Methodology

How We Review Products

We review product labels against published research and regulatory data today. Our own lab is being built for future physical testing.

Retail samples. Open limits.

We screen retail products, explain what the evidence can and cannot prove, and keep stronger claims behind review. Our in-house lab is on the way.

Our review steps

1

We buy the products

We buy products at retail — the same stuff you'd find at Target or Walgreens. No brand samples, no PR kits.

2

We review the disclosed evidence

Today we screen labels against published research and regulatory data. Every report says what evidence is available and what is still missing.

3

We make the science simple

We turn label, source, and any available lab evidence into practical context — what stood out, what did not, and what still needs review.

4

Future lab findings get confirmation

Once our lab program is operating, stronger primary findings can be confirmed by an independent, accredited lab before publication.

5

We publish with full transparency

We publish the evidence status, the scope of the review, and the limits readers should understand.

Planned lab targets

Illustrative methods and reporting targets under validation. Final methods and limits will be published before results.

  • Lead (Pb)

    ICP-MS

    < 0.1 ppm
  • Arsenic (As)

    ICP-MS

    < 0.1 ppm
  • Cadmium (Cd)

    ICP-MS

    < 0.05 ppm
  • Mercury (Hg)

    ICP-MS

    < 0.05 ppm
  • Phthalates

    GC-MS

    < 10 ppm
  • 1,4-Dioxane

    GC-MS

    < 1 ppm

See the lab build-out

See what is installed, what is still being validated, and what is not yet operating.

Evidence status, not a mystery score

Each report states whether it is label-only, source-backed, lab-backed, or still needs evidence.

  • Current published product reports are label-only unless a stronger evidence tier is shown.
  • A future lab result will describe the tested sample, not every future lot.
  • Ingredient concerns depend on dose, route of exposure, and product context.
  • Missing evidence stays visible instead of being turned into a stronger verdict.

Our Approach: Radical Transparency, Not Certification

What This IS:. An independent review of ingredient labels and public sources, with the evidence tier and limitations shown on each report. Our in-house lab is still in build-out.

What This is NOT:. A label-only report is not a sample-level laboratory test, regulatory compliance test, or product certification. It cannot verify the contents of a physical sample.

For educational and informational purposes only. Not medical advice. Consult qualified professionals for health decisions.

Company response

Are you the manufacturer? Dispute this data.

Credentials

  • Building to ISO 17025 standards

  • Planned methods under validation

  • Member-funded, not brand-funded

Browse screening reports

How We Review Products

Retail samples. Open limits.

We screen retail products, explain what the evidence can and cannot prove, and keep stronger claims behind review. Our in-house lab is on the way.

See the lab build-outBrowse all categories

The Investment

Built in-house. Run by us.

We're building our own analytical lab to sit behind our primary screening — not an outsourced black box.

Capital

Built In-House

We are building our own lab and analytical instrumentation so we can run primary tests ourselves, not outsource the core work.

Identification

Mass Spec & HPLC

High-resolution mass spectrometers and HPLC systems will quantify trace contaminants and check label claims with precision.

Composition

Elemental & Microbial

The planned program includes elemental analysis and microbial methods for heavy metals, contaminants, and pathogens.

Planned lab workflow

From future sample to publication.

Once physical testing begins, every sample will follow the same documented path. No strong claim until the evidence and limits are clear.

  1. 01

    ShopKeeper’s shelf

    Anonymous retail purchase

    We will buy products from real retail channels so tested samples match what consumers actually receive.

  2. 02

    TPR intake bench

    Chain-of-custody intake

    Each future sample will be logged, photographed, and sealed under the validated intake procedure.

  3. 03

    Mass Spec · HPLC

    Primary screening

    Validated mass-spectrometry and HPLC methods will identify compounds and check relevant label claims.

  4. 04

    Partner lab

    Level 2 confirmation

    Higher-risk primary findings can go to an independent, accredited Level 2 lab before stronger public claims are made.

  5. 05

    Data review

    Cross-verification

    When future result sets do not align, the answer will be more review or another run, not a stronger story.

  6. 06

    Review gate

    Evidence review

    The evidence tier, sample scope, limitations, and reviewer status will be checked before a report is drafted.

  7. 07

    Public report

    Publication with full data

    A report will go public only after its review is complete, with method details and source files where available.

Integrity

Independent confirmation

The planned workflow allows stronger in-house findings to be checked by an independent, accredited lab before publication.

Defensibility

Clearer evidence

If two analyses disagree, we will disclose the disagreement and keep the public claim narrow until it is resolved.

Instrumentation

What the planned lab will run.

These capabilities are part of the build-out. Final validated methods and limits will be published before any lab-backed report.

Mass Spectrometry

Planned validated methods will identify and quantify selected compounds at method-specific limits.

  • ICP-MS for heavy metals
  • LC-MS for organic compounds
  • GC-MS for volatiles

HPLC Analysis

Planned HPLC methods will separate and quantify selected compounds in complex formulations.

  • Active compound quantification
  • Preservative measurement
  • Compound purity checks

Microbial Analysis

Planned microbial methods will check for selected bacteria, mold, and other organisms of regulatory concern.

  • Total plate count
  • Yeast & mold
  • Pathogen screening (E. coli, Salmonella)

Nutritional Verification

Planned methods will compare selected nutrient measurements with the tested sample's label claims.

  • Protein content analysis
  • Vitamin & mineral levels
  • Calorie verification

Evidence status

Show the evidence tier first.

Every report states what supports it: a label review, disclosed sources, verified lab data, or insufficient evidence. Missing evidence stays visible instead of being hidden behind a number.

Label-only

The product label has been reviewed; no product sample was tested.

Source-backed

Published research or a disclosed external source supports the report.

Lab-backed

Verified sample-level lab data is attached to the report.

Insufficient evidence

The available material is not enough for a stronger public claim.

What an evidence status does not mean

  • An evidence tier is not medical advice or a safety certification.
  • A future lab result will describe the tested sample, not every future lot.
  • Ingredient concerns depend on dose, route of exposure, and product context.
  • Nutrition, ingredient evidence, contaminant testing, and personal fit stay separate.
  • Missing evidence is shown as missing evidence, not hidden behind a stronger verdict.
  • A report can change when formulas, batches, or scientific evidence change.

Important disclosures

Our Approach: Radical Transparency, Not Certification

We believe in showing you the data, the limitations, and letting you make informed decisions.

What This IS:

An independent review of ingredient labels and public sources, with the evidence tier and limitations shown on each report. Our in-house lab is still in build-out.

What This is NOT:

A label-only report is not a sample-level laboratory test, regulatory compliance test, or product certification. It cannot verify the contents of a physical sample.

Evidence limits:

Labels and public sources can support a review but cannot prove what is in a specific package. Any future lab-backed finding will identify the sample, method, source, and relevant limitations.

For educational and informational purposes only. Not medical advice. Consult qualified professionals for health decisions.

Manufacturer Response Portal

Are you the manufacturer? Dispute this data.

Submit a dispute

Join the report

Ready to see the evidence behind each report?

Join the members funding independent screening and the in-house lab build-out.

Become a memberBrowse products

FCRA Notice:The Product Report is NOT a Consumer Reporting Agency as defined under the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA). Our product screening data is not intended for use in determining any individual's eligibility for credit, insurance, employment, housing, or any other purpose covered by the FCRA. Product reports reflect our independent screening methodology only.

Have questions about our review process? Check our FAQ or contact us.